ITA // SURVIVAL SERIES // GAME 02
OFFICIAL AFTER-ACTION REPORT

THE BETRAYAL

REBFOR // FACTION INTELLIGENCE
OCTOBER 10, 2026  •  T.A.A.G.S. FIELD, KENT, WA
CAMPAIGN STATUS // FINAL RESULTS
REBFOR — 2ND PLACE
627 POINTS
01 // OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

BATTLEFIELD SUMMARY

REBFOR forces participated in six missions involving reconnaissance, resource recovery, territorial control, defensive operations, search and rescue, and extraction.

The faction encountered difficulties with organization and intelligence reporting during the opening mission but demonstrated strong resource recovery capabilities and aggressive territorial control as the operation progressed.

REBFOR effectively utilized elevated terrain, captured strategic positions, and established strong defensive operations.

During the final two missions, rebel forces demonstrated effective strategic decision-making, successful faction conversions, and disciplined defensive movement.

Despite the final mission being cut short due to field safety concerns, REBFOR demonstrated determination and coordinated battlefield operations throughout the engagement.

02 // SIX-MISSION DEBRIEF

MISSION BREAKDOWN

M1 // RECONNAISSANCE

SCOUT RECON

REBFOR forces struggled with organization and intelligence reporting during the opening reconnaissance mission.

Although contractors gathered and submitted intelligence from the field, very few reports contained the necessary information to provide Command with actionable intelligence.

Critical details such as location, contractor identification, descriptions, dates, and times were frequently missing.

These shortcomings reduced the operational value of the intelligence collected and contributed to difficulties identifying and securing essential survival resources, including water and life-sustaining supplies.

COMMAND ASSESSMENTIntelligence collection efforts were evident, but organization, reporting procedures, and resource identification require significant improvement.
M2 // RESOURCE RECOVERY

GATHER

REBFOR forces performed well during resource collection operations.

Contractors benefited from favorable positioning on elevated terrain, providing a tactical advantage during the gathering mission.

Using this advantage, rebel forces successfully located and collected a significant quantity of resources throughout the area of operations.

COMMAND ASSESSMENTStrong resource recovery performance, effective use of terrain advantages, and successful collection of valuable supplies.
M3 // TERRITORIAL CONTROL

COLLECT / CAPTURE / CONTROL

REBFOR forces demonstrated aggressive offensive action during the opening stages of the mission.

Contractors rapidly advanced and successfully captured two locations, establishing an early advantage in territorial control.

However, despite their strong initial performance, rebel forces failed to recover the fourth flag.

COMMAND ASSESSMENTAggressive offensive operations and successful early territorial capture. Completion of remaining objectives requires improvement.
M4 // DEFENSIVE OPERATIONS

CONTROL / DEFEND

REBFOR forces demonstrated strong defensive capabilities during the control and defense mission.

Contractors successfully consolidated control of three structures and established determined defensive positions.

Rebel forces fought aggressively to maintain control of their secured locations, demonstrating resilience and commitment throughout the engagement.

COMMAND ASSESSMENTStrong territorial control, determined defensive operations, and effective resistance against opposing forces.
M5 // SEARCH AND RESCUE

SECURE THE DOWNED PILOT

REBFOR forces demonstrated effective strategic thinking during the fifth mission.

Rather than relying exclusively on their existing faction strength, rebel forces successfully converted several significant contractors from opposing factions to support their objectives.

These conversions directly influenced battlefield operations and played a vital role in the faction's success.

COMMAND ASSESSMENTEffective strategic decision-making, successful recruitment of opposing forces, and significant operational advantages gained through faction conversions.
M6 // FINAL ENGAGEMENT

EXTRACTION

REBFOR forces demonstrated strong organization, discipline, and determination during the final extraction mission.

Contractors executed a coordinated fighting withdrawal, falling back collectively from position to position while maintaining control of their resources.

Throughout the engagement, rebel forces continued to resist opposing forces and fought valiantly to protect their assets.

Unfortunately, the final engagement was cut short due to safety concerns associated with the battlefield layout and game configuration.

As a result, the mission could not proceed to its originally intended conclusion.

COMMAND ASSESSMENTExcellent coordination during withdrawal, disciplined defensive movement, and determined resource protection. Final mission operations were curtailed due to field safety concerns.
03 // VERIFIED CAMPAIGN INTELLIGENCE

CAMPAIGN SCORE REPORT

CAPTURED ENEMY ITEMS

CATEGORYQUANTITYPOINTS
Captured Food44
Captured Cash230
Captured Gold690
Captured Life Coins10100
TOTAL—224

Medical Kits Recovered: 3 // 60 points.

FIELD INTELLIGENCE REPORTS

CLASSIFICATIONQUANTITYPOINTS
Basic Intelligence1818
Useful / Location Intelligence00
Clear Photo / Video Intelligence15
High-Value Mission Intelligence110
TOTAL2033

MISSION OBJECTIVES

OBJECTIVEQUANTITYPOINTS
M3 — Faction Flags5100
M4 — Components Secured9135
Players Transferred375
TOTAL—310

FINAL CAMPAIGN SCORE

CATEGORYPOINTS
Captured Enemy Items224
Medical Kits Recovered60
Field Intelligence Reports33
Mission Objectives310
Command Adjustments0
REBFOR — FINAL TOTAL627
04 // COMMAND DEBRIEF

FINAL COMMAND ASSESSMENT

REBFOR demonstrated strong offensive and defensive capabilities throughout the operation.

Early mission performance revealed weaknesses in intelligence documentation, organization, and identifying essential survival resources.

Despite these challenges, the faction demonstrated significant resource recovery capabilities and successfully utilized favorable terrain to support its operations.

The middle missions highlighted REBFOR's aggressive territorial advancement and determined defense of strategic structures.

During the final two missions, rebel forces demonstrated the importance of strategic decision-making, faction conversions, and coordinated defensive movement.

Their organized withdrawal during the extraction mission reflected strong discipline and a commitment to protecting collected resources.

STRENGTHS Resource recovery, aggressive territorial capture, defensive operations, effective use of elevated terrain, faction conversions, and coordinated withdrawal.
AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT Field intelligence documentation, organizational structure during reconnaissance, identifying essential survival resources, and completing remaining mission objectives.

COMMAND'S FINAL WORD

REBFOR demonstrated determination, aggressive battlefield tactics, and strong defensive capabilities throughout this unique operation.

Rebel forces effectively utilized elevated terrain and established defensive positions that presented significant tactical challenges to opposing factions.

Their ability to secure multiple structures, maintain territorial control, and recruit contractors from opposing forces demonstrated the value of strategic positioning and adaptability.

During the final extraction mission, REBFOR maintained an organized fighting withdrawal, protecting its resources while continuing to resist advancing opposition forces.

Unfortunately, safety concerns associated with the battlefield configuration required Command to conclude the final engagement before its intended completion.

Although the operation ended prematurely, REBFOR's performance demonstrated the importance of preparation, defensive coordination, adaptability, and maintaining control of valuable resources under pressure.

REBFOR // END OF AFTER-ACTION REPORT
ITA — IN-THEATER AIRSOFT
SURVIVAL SERIES — GAME TWO: THE BETRAYAL